On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > On 05/05/2014 11:20 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> >> >> >> How about: >> UPDATE foo SET (foo).* = (1,2,3); >> >> >> It is looking little bit strange >> >> I like previous proposal UPDATE foo SET foo = (1,2,3); >> > > What if the table has a field called foo? Won't it then be ambiguous?
See upthread: it prefers the field to the table if both are there (exactly as SELECT does). merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
