On 2014-05-05 08:03:04 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > postgres: checkpointer process
> > at least as useful. The only time that's not unique is in a BSD jail or
> > lxc container, and in those cases IIRC ps can show you the
> > jail/container anyway.
> Uhh, that's not at all true. You can trivially have multiple IPs on a
> box w/o jails or containers (aliased interfaces) and then run PG on the
> default port- which I find to be *far* more convenient than having the
> same IP and a bunch of different ports.
Only that you then need different socket directories. Do you really do
Anyway, I am happy having the cluster_name thingy.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: