On Mon, May  5, 2014 at 02:23:13PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > +      <listitem>
> > +       <para>
> > +        Have pg_stat_statements use a flat file for query text storage, 
> > allowing higher limits (Peter Geoghegan)
> > +       </para>
> > +
> > +       <para>
> > +        Also add the ability to retrieve all pg_stat_statements 
> > information except the query text.  This allows programs to reuse the query
> > +        text already retrieved by referencing queryid.
> > +       </para>
> > +      </listitem>
> >
> > This isn't an optional thing, is it?
> 
> This is intended to be used by time-series monitoring tools that
> aggregate and graph pg_stat_statements data temporally. They usually
> won't need query texts, and so can only retrieve them lazily. The
> pg_stat_statements view presents exactly the same interface for ad-hoc
> querying, though.
> 
> The point of the first item is that there is no longer *any*
> limitation on the size of stored query texts. They are no longer
> truncated to track_activity_query_size bytes. The shared memory
> overhead is also decreased substantially, allowing us to increase the
> default pg_stat_statements.max setting from 1,000 to 5,000, while
> still reducing the overall shared memory overhead (assuming a default
> track_activity_query_size). I think that the removal of the
> limitation, and the substantial lowering of the per-entry footprint
> should both be explicitly noted.

We rarely get into specific numers like this.  It says "higher limit(s)" and
hopefully that is enough.  If you want to create a documentation 'id' I
can like to that for the "higher limits" text.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to