On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > We rarely get into specific numers like this. It says "higher limit(s)" and > hopefully that is enough. If you want to create a documentation 'id' I > can like to that for the "higher limits" text.
You don't have to mention a number. Just the fact that there is now *no* limit on stored query text length, which is the point. It's also nice that the per-entry shared memory overhead is much lower, which as I said I think warrants a mention in passing. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers