On 17.5.2014 19:58, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 05/15/2014 07:47 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> On 15.5.2014 22:07, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> Yes, I've seen that. Frankly, a test that takes something like 500 >>> hours is a bit crazy. >> Maybe. It certainly is not a test people will use during development. >> But if it can detect some hard-to-find errors in the code, that might >> possibly lead to serious problems, then +1 from me to run them at least >> on one animal. 500 hours is ~3 weeks, which is not that bad IMHO. >> >> Also, once you know where it fails the developer can run just that >> single test (which might take minutes/hours, but not days). > > > > I have made a change that omits the snapshot sanity check for > CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY cases, but keeps it for all others. See > <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/server-code/commit/abd946918279b7683056a4fc3156415ef31a4675>
OK, thanks. Seems reasonable. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers