On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: >> On June 3, 2014 9:40:27 PM CEST, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >Maybe we could make it be controlled by TIMING. Seems like it fits >> >well-enough there. >> >> Don't think that fits well - TIMING imo is about reducing the timing >> overhead. But the server side total time is still interesting. I only >> thought about tacking it onto COST because that already is pretty much >> tailored for regression test usage. C.F. disabling the planning time. > > Pah. So what we need is a new mode, REGRESSTEST ON or something.
Well, we could invent that. But I personally think piggybacking on COSTS makes more sense. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
