On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> On June 3, 2014 9:40:27 PM CEST, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Maybe we could make it be controlled by TIMING.  Seems like it fits
>> >well-enough there.
>> Don't think that fits well - TIMING imo is about reducing the timing
>> overhead. But the server side total time is still interesting. I only
>> thought about tacking it onto COST because that already is pretty much
>> tailored for regression test usage. C.F. disabling the planning time.
> Pah.  So what we need is a new mode, REGRESSTEST ON or something.

Well, we could invent that.  But I personally think piggybacking on
COSTS makes more sense.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to