On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> On June 3, 2014 9:40:27 PM CEST, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Maybe we could make it be controlled by TIMING. Seems like it fits
>> >well-enough there.
>> Don't think that fits well - TIMING imo is about reducing the timing
>> overhead. But the server side total time is still interesting. I only
>> thought about tacking it onto COST because that already is pretty much
>> tailored for regression test usage. C.F. disabling the planning time.
> Pah. So what we need is a new mode, REGRESSTEST ON or something.
Well, we could invent that. But I personally think piggybacking on
COSTS makes more sense.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: