On 08/06/14 05:03, Kevin Grittner wrote: [...]
I found it hard to decide how far to go in the docs versus the Wiki page. Any suggestions or suggested patches welcome.
I know this is subjective, but that seems to me a little too much in an academic style for the docs. In the Wiki page examples I tried to use a style more accessible to DBAs and application programmers. Don't get me wrong, I found various papers by Alan Fekete and others very valuable while working on the feature, but they are often geared more toward those developing such features than those using them. That said, I know I'm not the best word-smith in the community, and would very much welcome suggestions from others on the best way to cover this. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
I know that I first look at the docs & seldom look at the Wiki - in fact it was only recently that I became aware of the Wiki, and it is still not the first thing I think of when I want to know something, and I often forget it exists. I suspect many people are like me in this!
Also the docs have a more authoritative air, and probably automatically assumed to be more up-to-date and relevant to the version of Postgres used.
So I suggest that the docs should have an appropriate coverage of such topics, possibly mostly in an appendix with brief references in affected parts of the main docs) if it does not quite fit into the rest of the documentation (affects many different features, so no one place in the main docs is appropriate - or too detailed, or too much). Also links to the Wiki, and to the more academic papers, could be provided for the really keen.
Cheers, Gavin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers