On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurj...@singh.im> wrote:
> And it's probably accepted by now that such a bahviour is not
> catastrophic, merely inconvenient.
I think the whole argument for having pg_hibernator is that getting
the block cache properly initialized is important. If it's not
important, then we don't need pg_hibernator in the first place. But
if it is important, then I think not loading unrelated blocks into
shared_buffers is also important.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: