On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurj...@singh.im> wrote: > And it's probably accepted by now that such a bahviour is not > catastrophic, merely inconvenient.
I think the whole argument for having pg_hibernator is that getting the block cache properly initialized is important. If it's not important, then we don't need pg_hibernator in the first place. But if it is important, then I think not loading unrelated blocks into shared_buffers is also important. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers