Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-06-14 16:57:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > I noticed that HEAD crashes at startup with assertions disabled and > > > WAL_DEBUG turned on: > > > > I'm beginning to think we're going to have to give up on that > > no-pallocs-in-critical-sections Assert. It was useful to catch > > unnecessarily-dangerous allocations in mainline cases, but getting rid > > of every last corner-case palloc is looking to be, if not impossible, > > at least a lot more trouble than it is worth. > > I think we at least need to remove it from 9.4. We shouldn't release > with an assertion that still regularly triggers in more or less > 'harmless' situations.
Advertising
Yeah, removing it in 9.4 is likely a good idea -- we have an open item about it in connection with LWLOCK_DEBUG, and now this. Who knows what other debugging features will cause trouble. > I think it might be worthwile to keep it in master to help maintain the > rule against allocations in critical sections. And perhaps as a reminder > that e.g. the checkpointer is doing bad things... I also agree with keeping it in 9.5. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
