I wrote: > Gurjeet Singh <gurj...@singh.im> writes: >> I tried to eliminate the 'pending' list, but I don't see a way around it. >> We need temporary storage somewhere to store the branches encountered on >> the right; in recursion case the call stack was serving that purpose.
> I still think we should fix this in the grammar, rather than introducing > complicated logic to try to get rid of the recursion later. For example, > as attached. I went looking for (and found) some additional obsoleted comments, and convinced myself that ruleutils.c is okay as-is, and pushed this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers