Thanks! On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Gurjeet Singh <gurj...@singh.im> writes: >>> I tried to eliminate the 'pending' list, but I don't see a way around it. >>> We need temporary storage somewhere to store the branches encountered on >>> the right; in recursion case the call stack was serving that purpose. > >> I still think we should fix this in the grammar, rather than introducing >> complicated logic to try to get rid of the recursion later. For example, >> as attached. > > I went looking for (and found) some additional obsoleted comments, and > convinced myself that ruleutils.c is okay as-is, and pushed this. > > regards, tom lane
-- Gurjeet Singh http://gurjeet.singh.im/ EDB www.EnterpriseDB.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
