Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-06-17 21:09:25 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>> At 2014-06-17 11:32:37 -0400, br...@momjian.us wrote:
>>> Uh, what is replacing SRFs?  CTEs?

>> I don't think Tom was referring to SRFs in general, only putting them
>> directly into the targetlist of a SELECT.

> And the primary reason for using SRFs in the targetlist has gone away
> due to LATERAL.

Exactly.  LATERAL does what you usually want from a SRF in the
targetlist, and it doesn't have bizarre semantics when you use more than
one.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to