Vik Fearing <vik.fear...@dalibo.com> writes: > On 06/18/2014 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> So to implement a feature one now has to implement the most generic >> variant as a prototype first? Really?
> Well, there is the inventor's paradox to consider. I have not seen anyone demanding a different implementation in this thread. What *has* been asked for, and not supplied, is a concrete defense of the particular level of generality that's been selected in this implementation. It's not at all clear to the rest of us whether it was the right choice, and that is something that ought to be asked now not later. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers