Tom,

* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> [ counting bits in ACLs ]
> 
> Wouldn't it be fairly painless to widen AclMode from 32 bits to 64,
> and thereby double the number of available bits?

Thanks for commenting on this.  I hadn't considered that but I don't see
any particular problem with it either..

> In any case, I concur with the position that this feature patch should
> be separate from a patch to make additional bitspace available.

Certainly.  Thanks for your thoughts.

        Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to