Tom, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> [ counting bits in ACLs ] > > Wouldn't it be fairly painless to widen AclMode from 32 bits to 64, > and thereby double the number of available bits?
Thanks for commenting on this. I hadn't considered that but I don't see any particular problem with it either.. > In any case, I concur with the position that this feature patch should > be separate from a patch to make additional bitspace available. Certainly. Thanks for your thoughts. Stephen
Description: Digital signature