Well the latest NetBSD/vax package build doesn't seem to include any
http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/vax/6.0_2014Q1/ but I
don't know why.
I'll try a quick (hah :) build this end to see what happens
On 24 June 2014 02:12, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>
> >> However, we don't know of anyone who has tried to do this in a very
> >> long time, and are therefore considering removing the remaining
> >> support for the VAX platform. Has anyone tried to build PostgreSQL
> >> for VAX lately?
> > Actually I tried a while ago but got stuck configuring the network on
> > simh so I could get all the tools. I can try again if there's interest
> > but we don't necessarily need to keep a port just because there's a
> > simulator for it.
> That's really up to you. I'm not particularly interested in
> generating interest in maintaining this port if there wouldn't
> otherwise be any; I'm trying to figure out whether there is existing
> interest in it. For all I know, <whatever>BSD is shipping PostgreSQL
> binaries for VAX and every other platform they support in each new
> release and people are using them to get real work done. Then again,
> for all I know, it doesn't even compile on that platform, and if you
> did manage to get it to compile it wouldn't fit on the disk, and if
> you managed to fit it on the disk it wouldn't work because key system
> calls aren't supported. If someone is still interested in this, I'm
> hoping they'll help us figure out whether it's anywhere close to
> working, and maybe even contribute a buildfarm critter. If no one
> cares, then let's just rip it out and be done with it.
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company