On 2014-06-25 10:39:53 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 06/25/2014 10:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [sorry for the second copy Robert] > > > > Attached is a new version of the atomic operations patch. Lots has > > changed since the last post: > > Is this at a state where we can performance-test it yet?
Well, this patch itself won't have a performance impact at all. It's about proving the infrastructure to use atomic operations in further patches in a compiler and platform independent way. I'll repost a new version of the lwlocks patch (still fighting an issue I introduced while rebasing ntop of Heikki's xlog scalability/lwlock merger) soon. Addressing the review comments Amit has made since. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
