I've seen the idea of "user resource limits" bandied about before as a
way to address these problems; depending on implementation that might be
the way to go.
Robert Treat
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 12:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there any way to recognize infinite recursion by analyzing the saved
> > execution tree -- i.e. can we assume that a function that calls itself, with
> > the same arguments with which it was called, constitutes infinite recursion?
>
> A bulletproof solution would be equivalent to solving the halting
> problem, I believe. The test you mentioned is easily defeated by
> recursing between two functions. Also, a would-be instigator of
> DOS doesn't need *infinite* recursion; it could be quite finite and
> still blow out your stack. For example ask for factorial(10million)
> where factorial is defined in the traditional recursive way...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
