On 2014-07-07 04:20:12 +0000, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
> On 04 July 2014 19:29, MauMau Wrote:
> > [How to fix]
> > Of course, adding "-o '-c synchronous_commit=local'" or "-o '-c
> > synchronous_standby_names='" to pg_ctl start in the recovery script
> > would prevent the problem.
> > But isn't there anything to fix in PostgreSQL? I think the doc needs
> > improvement so that users won't misunderstand that only write
> > transactions would block at commit.
> As of now there is no solution for this in PostgreSQL but I had submitted a
> patch "Standalone synchronous master" in
> 9.4 2014-01 CommitFest, which was rejected because of some issues. This patch
> was meant to degrade the synchronous
> level of master, if all synchronous standbys are down.
> I plan to resubmit this with better design sometime in 9.5.
That seems to be more less orthogonal to the issue at hand. The problem
here is that a readonly command lead to a wait. And even worse it was a
command the user had no influence over.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: