On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and >>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog. >>>> >>>> +1. >>> >>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have >>> something several people can live with ;) >> >> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones >> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a >> doghouse I won't worry much about the color. >> >> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of >> pg_catalog.
Is there any blocker on this patch? The patch looks good to me. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
