On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and >>>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog. >>>>> >>>>> +1. >>>> >>>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have >>>> something several people can live with ;) >>> >>> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones >>> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a >>> doghouse I won't worry much about the color. >>> >>> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of >>> pg_catalog. > > Is there any blocker on this patch? The patch looks good to me.
The patch makes the tab-completion on search_path display the existing schemas, additionally what about displaying "$user", too? I think that some users would want to include "$user" variable in search_path. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
