Bruce Momjian writes: > So, that is why MOVE 0 goes to the end of the cursor. One idea would be > for MOVE 0 to actually move nothing, but jdbc and others need the > ability to move the end of the cursor, perhaps to then back up a certain > amount and read from there. Seems MOVE 0 is the logical way to do that. > (I can't think of another reasonable value).
It would seem more logical and reasonable for MOVE 0 to do nothing and have some special syntax such as MOVE LAST to move to the end. (MOVE LAST would actually be consistent with the standard syntax FETCH LAST.) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
