On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't think a buildfarm animal that doesn't run the actual upstream >> code is a good idea. That'll make it a lot harder to understand what's >> going on when something breaks after a commit. It'd also require the >> custom patches being rebased ontop of $branch before every run... > > hm. oh well. maybe if there was a separate page for custom builds > (basically, an unsupported section).
I think that's a bad idea. The QNX OS seems to be mostly used in safety-critical systems; it has a microkernel design. I think it would be particularly bad to have iffy support for something like that. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
