On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the
> right stuff in the file this time.

Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these
additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to