On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the
>> right stuff in the file this time.
>
> Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these
> additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.

I've committed the patch I posted yesterday.  I did not see a good
reason to meld that together in a single commit with the first of the
patches you posted; I'll leave you to revise that patch to conform
with this approach.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to