On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 08:51:13AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > At 2014-08-07 23:22:43 +0900, masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: > >> That is, we log replication commands only when log_statement is set to > >> all. Neither new parameter is introduced nor log_statement is > >> redefined as a list. > > > > That sounds good to me. > > It sounds fairly unprincipled to me. I liked the idea of making > log_statement a list, but if we aren't gonna do that, I think this > should be a separate parameter.
I am unclear there is enough demand for a separate replication logging parameter --- using log_statement=all made sense to me. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
