Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2. The patch seems to think that it can sometimes be safe to change > > the relpersistence of an existing relation. Unless you can be sure > > that no buffers can possibly be present in shared_buffers and nobody > > will use an existing relcache entry to read a new one in, it's not, > > because the buffers won't have the right BM_PERSISTENT marking. I'm > > very nervous about the fact that this patch seems not to have touched > > bufmgr.c, but maybe I'm missing something. > > Because of this concern I implement a solution pointed by Andres [1]. Actually what you did was better than what he suggested. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
