Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote:
> > I pointed out, in the email just before pushing the patch, that perhaps > > we should pass down the new relpersistence flag into finish_heap_swap, > > and from there we could pass it down to reindex_index() which is where > > it would be needed. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, but I think we > > can still ask Fabrizio to rework that part. > I can rework this part if it's a real concern. I guess we can make a better assessment by seeing what it would take. I'm afraid it will turn out to be really ugly. Now, there's some desire to have unlogged indexes on logged tables; I guess if we have that, then eventually there will also be a desire to swap individual indexes from logged to unlogged. Perhaps whatever fix we come up with here would pave the road for that future feature. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
