On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better > than what we have today. Well, if somebody has some interest in that, here is a rebased patch with the approach using low-level locks: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRkwKFgn4BFUybqU-Oo-=gcbq0k-8h93gr6fx-ggrp...@mail.gmail.com -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
