On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:29:31PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:18:22AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > What's happening about this? Buildfarm animal jacana is consistently > > red because of this. > > If nobody plans to do the aforementioned analysis in the next 4-7 days, I > suggest we adopt one of Michael's suggestions: force "configure" to reach its > old conclusion about getaddrinfo() on Windows. Then the analysis can proceed > on an unhurried schedule.
Done. Incidentally, jacana takes an exorbitant amount of time, most recently 87 minutes, to complete the ecpg-check step. Frogmouth takes 4 minutes, and none of the other steps have such a large multiplier between the two animals. That pattern isn't new and appears on multiple branches. I wonder if ecpg tickles a performance bug in 64-bit MinGW-w64. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
