On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 07:54:09AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I am not against to improve a PL/pgSQL. And I repeat, what can be done and can > be done early: > > a) ASSERT clause -- with some other modification to allow better static > analyze > of DML statements, and enforces checks in runtime. > > b) #option or PRAGMA clause with GUC with function scope that enforce check on > processed rows after any DML statement > > c) maybe introduction automatic variable ROW_COUNT as shortcut for GET > DIAGNOSTICS rc = ROW_COUNT
All these ideas are being captured somewhere, right? Where? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
