On 09/02/2014 03:19 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:


On 09/01/2014 02:04 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
Please share your wish list of things you would want in plpgsql2 which
are not possible to implement in plpgsql because they could possibly
break compatibility.

Well, if I were designing a new procedural SQL extension language, I
wouldn't base it on the bastard child of ADA and SQL89.  I would come up
with something new.  One of the critical features such a new language
would have would be the ability to dynamically generate queries
*without* using string manipulation and EXECUTE.

Otherwise, improvements to PL/pgSQL amount to the proverbial porcine
makeover.


+1

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
             not be surprised when they come back as Romans."


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to