* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> ignore_nulls in array_to_json_pretty probably is not necessary. On second
> hand, the cost is zero, and we can have it for API consistency.

I'm willing to be persuaded either way on this, really.  I do think it
would be nice for both array_to_json and row_to_json to be single
functions which take default values, but as for if array_to_json has a
ignore_nulls option, I'm on the fence and would defer to people who use
that function regularly (I don't today).

Beyond that, I'm pretty happy moving forward with this patch.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to