2014-09-08 6:27 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > * Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > ignore_nulls in array_to_json_pretty probably is not necessary. On second > > hand, the cost is zero, and we can have it for API consistency. > > I'm willing to be persuaded either way on this, really. I do think it > would be nice for both array_to_json and row_to_json to be single > functions which take default values, but as for if array_to_json has a > ignore_nulls option, I'm on the fence and would defer to people who use > that function regularly (I don't today). > > Beyond that, I'm pretty happy moving forward with this patch. >
ok Regards Pavel > > Thanks, > > Stephen >