* Alvaro Herrera ( wrote:
> Thanks.  One more tweak --- the whole reason for fiddling with this is
> to ensure that event triggers support this operation.  Therefore this
> node should be handled by ProcessUtilitySlow, not
> standard_ProcessUtility, as in the attached patch.


> I propose this for 9.4 too.


> I bet they have!  Have fun,

Thanks!  I'm trying to. :)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to