Alvaro, * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Thanks. One more tweak --- the whole reason for fiddling with this is > to ensure that event triggers support this operation. Therefore this > node should be handled by ProcessUtilitySlow, not > standard_ProcessUtility, as in the attached patch.
[...] > I propose this for 9.4 too. Done. > I bet they have! Have fun, Thanks! I'm trying to. :) Stephen
Description: Digital signature