On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote:
> Re: Vik Fearing 2014-09-02 <5405d2d9.9050...@dalibo.com>
>> > Uhm, are we agreed on the decision on not to backpatch this? I would
>> > think this should have been part of the initial ALTER SYSTEM SET patch
>> > and thus should be backpatched to 9.4.
>> I think it belongs in 9.4 as well, especially if we're having another beta.
> My original complaint was about 9.4, so I'd like to see it there, yes.
ISTM that the consensus is to do the back-patch to 9.4.
Does anyone object to the back-patch? If not, I will do that.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: