On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote: >> Re: Vik Fearing 2014-09-02 <5405d2d9.9050...@dalibo.com> >>> > Uhm, are we agreed on the decision on not to backpatch this? I would >>> > think this should have been part of the initial ALTER SYSTEM SET patch >>> > and thus should be backpatched to 9.4. >>> >>> I think it belongs in 9.4 as well, especially if we're having another beta. >> >> My original complaint was about 9.4, so I'd like to see it there, yes. > > ISTM that the consensus is to do the back-patch to 9.4. > Does anyone object to the back-patch? If not, I will do that.
Done because no one voiced objection against the back-patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
