On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote:
>> Re: Vik Fearing 2014-09-02 <5405d2d9.9050...@dalibo.com>
>>> > Uhm, are we agreed on the decision on not to backpatch this? I would
>>> > think this should have been part of the initial ALTER SYSTEM SET patch
>>> > and thus should be backpatched to 9.4.
>>> I think it belongs in 9.4 as well, especially if we're having another beta.
>> My original complaint was about 9.4, so I'd like to see it there, yes.
> ISTM that the consensus is to do the back-patch to 9.4.
> Does anyone object to the back-patch? If not, I will do that.
Done because no one voiced objection against the back-patch.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: