On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks like it's squashed one of the very fundamental buffer > scaling issues though; well done Amit. Thanks. > I'll go back to my notes and try to recreate the pathological cases > that plagued both the 8.3 BGW rewrite and the aborted 9.2 fsync > spreading effort I did; get those running again and see how they > do on this new approach. I have a decent sized 24 core server > that should be good enough for this job. I'll see what I can do. It will be really helpful if you can try out those cases. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
