On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:35:10PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > In my understanding PostgreSQL's manual MUST include the ICU license > > term (this is not a problem). What I am not so sure is, any software > > uses PostgreSQL also MUST include the ICU license or not. If yes, I > > think this is surely a problem. > > Only if we're thinking of distributing it. If the user gets ICU from > their distribution then there is no need to list the licence (just like > we don't need to mention the licence of glibc). We only need link > against it, not distribute it. > I understand how it'd works with extension, but not with core. > > Have a nice day, > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he > does > > not attach much importance to his own thoughts. > -- Arthur Schopenhauer > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIVAwUBVBrBQkvt++dL5i1EAQhDehAAiQg7iLKficvXMSfAvwR+8Qp7yTG3wiNu > oZ5ieomZCYhlTpXvHae9dWTJPKehjiCCy/zjVyLpFvfHQVptadjBVefkIFSS/d+V > Y7X3gPI3d+8Tc+ZGVZF/CX/5eG9iPgKbsDRpK0zs5j+C4D1HYjxLFf4jWYI/gTXN > Abfr6taSi4YrSAw/4bSMlSQMFDU/wmLx175R4f8j2CvEYmspgXe89i4QU2V14m6Y > bB+zGhkxxJZAubTq3UcPzDDeX3FH4KqS/4NTSZ1V1ceIWo3r9jRPLHpceAvQlHwP > e4eNnRkFZbTeLlOUcvd7N7qkEc2kDYEGXKyaNqr868N022mFiYx4AHwOU/U/dbmm > Xw22FpSTwkokmwugohr7wrL7tUJV7NtHrcEUyPd/2cuddIRvO2H2iV4wqR6ct0TZ > 2RCd1b7bIKq+ywrGkySW1xplMhGmGygfPnUzqzlZ2f1YxcmK6PNMnpxldy5nvl3V > 2rNnPOoWS3H+R6aE31sSGH+Gl9w6J4lvpPiTAwx8pGoBPi4fWWqvwHUPp7FNqsAO > 8fjo00+MN9Vbg0YsqHiE6oCp2pKs3BJy3IHfZiw2nefh9UcEV29666atUBJjb3bw > hO65Km7uzoacX+WKm0XdmaQhdUwVJKIFFoH3sxnawA6+CUr4M8mUDtQicnd/ajRo > HX0lbgRk9z4= > =31r4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
