On 22 September 2014 14:46, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 04:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
>>> On 09/22/2014 07:47 AM, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
>>>> So my proposal is to skip the condition check on the first scan key
>>>> condition for every tuple.
>>> The same happens in a single-column case. If you have a query like
>>> "SELECT * FROM tbl2 where id2 > 'a'", once you've found the start
>>> position of the scan, you know that all the rows that follow match too.
>> ... unless you're doing a backwards scan.
> Sure. And you have to still check for NULLs. Have to get the details right..
And also that the tests don't use volatile functions.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: