All, On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 09/27/2014 10:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> >>> On 09/27/2014 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>>> So my vote is for a separate function and no optional arguments. >>>> >>> You mean like row_to_json_no_nulls() and json_agg_no_nulls()? >>> >> I thought you were proposing that we should revert the committed patch >> lock-stock-n-barrel, and instead invent json_strip_null_fields(). >> That's instead, not in addition to. Even if you weren't saying that >> exactly, that's where my vote goes. >> > > > I was just exploring alternatives. But I think that's where my vote goes > too. > I'm fine with that. I'd like the strip-Nulls capability, but seems like it'd be better off as an independent function (or functions) instead. Thanks, Stephen
