Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Done --- 201409291 is the cutover point.

> Just to clarify- the commit bumped the catversion to 201409292, so
> version <= 201409291 has the old format while version > 201409291 has
> the new format.  There was no 201409291, so I suppose it doesn't matter
> too much, but technically 'version >= 201409291' wouldn't be accurate.

Nope.  See my response to Andrew: ...1 is the cutover commit Bruce
should use, because that's what it is in 9.4.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to