* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Done --- 201409291 is the cutover point.
> 
> > Just to clarify- the commit bumped the catversion to 201409292, so
> > version <= 201409291 has the old format while version > 201409291 has
> > the new format.  There was no 201409291, so I suppose it doesn't matter
> > too much, but technically 'version >= 201409291' wouldn't be accurate.
> 
> Nope.  See my response to Andrew: ...1 is the cutover commit Bruce
> should use, because that's what it is in 9.4.

Yup, makes sense.

        Thanks!

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to