On 6 October 2014 14:09, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a good catch and it should be a separate patch. This could even be > considered for a back-patch down to 9.2. Thoughts?
If I isolate "DROP INDEX concurrently", this patch would do the trick.
20141006_drop_index_concurrently.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
