On 10/10/14 6:53 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > I'm not particularly thrilled with this answer. I'd aruge that the > 'materialized' part of mat views isn't relevant to the standard, which > does not concern itself with such performance-oriented considerations, > and therefore, to the standard's view (pun rather intended), they're > views.
For example, you can't drop a materialized view with DROP VIEW. So any tool that offers a list of views to manipulate based on the information schema would be confused. This is different from temporary views, for example. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
