Jan Wieck wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Jan Wieck writes: > > > > > > > To Hannu: the Windows port we did here depends on MS VC++ features like > > > > the ability to specify in the project to substitute header files. I > > > > don't know much about MingW and if you can do things like that with it. > > > > > > Before long someone will port the Windows port to MinGW, so we should > > > resist attempts to use compiler-specific features in the same way that we > > > tend not to use vendors specific features in other ports. > > > > Agreed. I will make as clean a patch as possible. I think it is > > doable. > > The thing with this particular feature was not to touch almost every > source file in the whole tree. The headers to #include in a clean Win32 > world are totally different from what you #include in Unix.
OK, I am looking at the SRA patch and I don't see a huge number of #include changes. Can you give an example? Also, isn't there a way to do this in a more centralized way, perhaps in c.h? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
