On 15 October 2014 21:03, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So you're familiar then with this process? So you know that an auditor >> would trigger an investigation, resulting in deeper surveillance and >> gathering of evidence that ends with various remedial actions, such as >> court. How would that process start then, if not this way? > > I've seen lots of such investigations fail because the evidence wasn't > strong enough to link to a particular person, but rather a computer > terminal or something like that. So your solution to the evidence problem is to do nothing? Or you have a better suggestion? Nothing is certain, apart from doing nothing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
