* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > Ah, good point. Using ALTER ROLE is better. Maybe we should do ALTER > ROLE .. [ ADD | DROP ] CAPABILITY x. That would still require making > CAPABILITY a keyword, but it could be unreserved.
That works for me- would we change the existing role attributes to be
configurable this way and change everything over to using an int64 in
the catalog? Unless I'm having trouble counting, I think that would
actually result in the pg_authid catalog not changing in size at all
while giving us the ability to add these capabilities and something like
50 others if we had cause to.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
