On 17 October 2014 12:52, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is quite possible, but still I think to accomplish such a function, > we need to have some mechanism where it can inform auto vacuum > and then some changes in auto vacuum to receive/read that information > and reply back. I don't think any such mechanism exists. That's exactly how the CHECKPOINT command works, in conjunction with the checkpointer process. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
