Thom Brown wrote: > On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it> writes: > > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends > > > you found. > > > > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what > > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and > > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the > > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the > > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already > > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious > > problems mentioned in > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > and > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > > > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF. > > > > Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
Not in this room. Do you? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
