On 25 October 2014 19:19, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > On 25 October 2014 13:28, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Thom Brown wrote: >> > On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > >> > > Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it> writes: >> > > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose >> ends >> > > > you found. >> > > >> > > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses >> what >> > > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, >> and >> > > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the >> > > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains >> the >> > > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already >> > > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious >> > > problems mentioned in >> > > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053...@sss.pgh.pa.us >> > > and >> > > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094...@sss.pgh.pa.us >> > > >> > > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF. >> > > >> > >> > Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage? >> >> Not in this room. Do you? > > > I'm not qualified to, but I'm happy to make time to test it when it next > gets picked up. My email was really just bumping the topic. >
I should mention that the latest patch no longer applies against git master, so I can't test it in its current form. -- Thom
